Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19

Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19
Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing: November 28, 29, 1989 Judgment: March 29, 1990
Full case name: The Board of Education of the Indian Head School Division No. 19 of Saskatchewan v. Ronald Gary Knight Citations: [1990] 1 S.C.R. 653 Ruling: Appeal allowed.
Court membership
Chief Justice: Brian Dickson Puisne Justices: Antonio Lamer, Bertha Wilson, Gérard La Forest, Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin
Reasons given
Majority by: L'Heureux-Dube J.

Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 653 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on procedural fairness in Canadian administrative law. The Court created a threshold test to determine whether an administrative process invoked a common law duty of fairness based on the nature of the decision, relationship between the parties, and the effect on the individual claimant.

Contents 1 Background 2 3 Prong Test 3 See also 4 External links

Background

Ronald Gary Knight was dismissed as superintendent of a school board. His position was held at pleasure. His dismissal was not for personal reasons, but he claimed procedural fairness should apply and a hearing should have been held.

3 Prong Test

In order for procedural fairness to apply at common-law, certain requirements must be met. According to L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ J. they are:

1. Nature of the decision to be made by the administrative body:

(a)Administrative vs. Legislative use of power

• Administrative powers attract procedural fairness while legislative powers do not

(b) Final decision maker

• Preliminary or interlocutory decisions don’t envoke procedural fairness

2. Relationship existing between that body and the individual; and

• Exercise of power in pursuant to statute (or prerogative) (executive action)

3. Effect of that decision on the individual's rights (privileges / interests)

• Low threshold requiring only that applicant have an interest and that it be impacted

If all of these criteria are met then procedural fairness is triggered and the court will decide what procedures the applicant is due.

See also

• List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
• Canadian administrative law
• Cardinal v. Director of Kent Institution (1986)

External links

• Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUMand CanLII